close
Jump to content

User talk:Akshadev

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 days ago by Noukayami in topic Your nomination of ISRO is under review

Your submission at Articles for creation: Launch vehicles of ISRO has been accepted

[edit]
Image
Launch vehicles of ISRO, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cptabhiimanyuseven โ€ข[@pรญng mั”] 08:26, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Skyroot Aerospace has failed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Skyroot Aerospace has Image failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OzmoOzmo -- OzmoOzmo (talk) 01:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article nominations RfC

[edit]

Hi Akshadev,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tata Electronics has been accepted

[edit]
Image
Tata Electronics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:23, 22 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tata Electronics for deletion

[edit]
Image
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tata Electronics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tata Electronics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

scope_creepTalk 19:08, 22 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

August 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sulfurboy. An edit that you recently made to Tata Electronics seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:06, 23 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Message

[edit]

Hello there! Could you please send me a message? I would like to discuss this privately, if you are willing to talk with me for future reference. Agent Viraj (talk ยท contribs) 13:39, 23 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Agent Viraj: I have left you a message on your talk page. โ€“ ๐™ฐ๐š”๐šœ๐š‘๐šŠ๐š๐šŽ๐šŸโ„ข ๐šƒ๐šŠ๐š•๐š” 13:45, 23 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Please see my usertalkpage for the references. Agent Viraj (talk ยท contribs) 14:11, 23 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of ISRO is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article ISRO is Image under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Noukayami -- Noukayami (talk) 02:44, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply