^⋆_✦ Welcome! ✦

NOTICE: After I finish writing the Nysa–Polana complex article, I'll take a (maybe short?) break from Wikipedia. I got a lot of things to do outside of here.

~~ ˚₊‧ ꒰১ΔΔΔ໒꒱ ‧₊˚ ~~
_✦^✦ • Introduction • ^✦_✦
~~< ⊗ >~~

I am an aspiring astronomer and planetary scientist, currently in my final year in my undergraduate astrophysics degree in college. I mainly specialize in minor planets, comets and moons, but I sometimes dabble in other stuff too. I intend to study asteroids, comets, trans-Neptunian objects, and irregular satellites in grad school, although I am not sure where to go, especially in the United States where the current climate isn't looking so great for planetary science...

Update this page

I joined Wikipedia in February 2019 and made my first edits to Hippocamp, a Neptunian moon that just got named at the time. Now, my main activities on Wikipedia include expanding and completing articles up to Good Article (GA) status, keeping important lists (i.e. Moons of Jupiter) up to date, and creating new articles on new discoveries or other interesting astronomical objects. As of July 2026^[update], I've written over 25 GA-rated articles, albeit most of these were written before 2020, when I was less experienced. These old GAs are now fairly outdated and I don't have the motivation to rewrite these unfortunately.

There are so many interesting planetary science articles that are poorly written and incomplete (like the minor moons of Saturn), and I wish I had more free time and energy to polish all of these up. But alas... I am a mere student and it is simply impossible to hold up the entirety of small Solar System body science myself.

Beyond this, I occasionally make typo corrections and small updates to minor planet and comet articles on Wikipedia. When I get bored enough, I turn to creating userboxes and decorating my user page. My custom userboxes are listed at User:Nrco0e/Userboxes; feel free to use them for your own user page!

I'm only active here intermittently and I may take long breaks from Wikipedia if I get burnt out. Do not expect me to immediately respond to talk page interaction or article maintenance here. If there are urgent matters and concerns about my decisions, please do message me in my talk page or ping me elsewhere with the template {{ping|Nrco0e}}. I'm open to feedback about my actions, so please do let me know if I've made a mistake!

I adhere to the Wiki philosophy of being bold and ignoring the rules when necessary, though only if you actually know what you're doing (like if you have a degree related to it). If you're gonna add something within the lines of original research (that is not cruft nonsense), be really cautious—as long it clarifies the content more AND you have the proper sources to support and justify it.

What does my username mean?

It means nothing. When I was creating my Wikipedia account back in 2019, I was originally going to use my gaming username for my Wikipedia account. But it turned out that was already used, so I did a random keysmash of letters on the spot. "Nrco0e" was what I got from that, and I decided to keep that because why not. (so ingenious am I right?)

Why is your userpage so fancy?

Personally, I believe every site including Wikipedia needs a bit of personalized spicing. The Internet is too uniform and bland nowadays, and I'm tired of seeing the same old flat design everywhere. So, how about we bring back our beloved GeoCities/Myspace website aesthetic with some CSS magic?

How should I behave around you?

Please don't act like an annoying immature kid, a conspiracy nut, or a bigot. I'm also often busy outside of Wikipedia, so please be patient if I'm taking a while to respond. And of course, have some common sense and decency, and don't act like a jerk (unless you have a good reason... you better tell me then)

Lately I've noticed that there's a lot of preteen and young teenage editors trying to rewrite and add stuff to Wikipedia astronomy articles, but oftentimes they grossly misunderstand the source and end up writing nonsense with typically poor grammar. It's very tiring having to babysit and deal with such young people so regularly—on this website of all places.

Why do you edit Wikipedia?

(prepare for a super cheesy and stupidly naive story that I hastily wrote up while tired at 1 am)

To preface, I mainly write articles about natural things in the Solar System, especially on obscure asteroids, comets, and moons. No spaceflight and rockets, because that stuff really isn't my cup of tea, and preferably nothing about humans and politics, because that stuff is difficult to deal with and Wikipedia absolutely sucks when it comes to that kind of stuff. That aside, I find it super interesting to learn what else is out there in our celestial neighborhood, and what they're like! As fascinating as they are, there's unfortunately not a lot of places where you can easily read and learn about them. I remember when I was a young child, I used to wonder about all of the other moons of planets, but felt frustrated that I couldn't find any information about them anywhere. For example, there were no photos nor interesting facts about any of the lesser-known moons like Sinope and Sponde—not even books, NASA's website, or Wikipedia bothered to talk about them beyond a few sentences! So when I found out that I can search up papers for detailed information, dig through public (but obscure) data archives for images, and put them all on Wikipedia, I knew that I had to share this valuable information to the world.

Nowadays the scene is a bit different, particularly on the modern Internet. People love learning about things in astronomy, but they most likely get their information from sensationalized social media posts and videos, which often exaggerate and cut details for the sake of views (*ahem* J1407b). Or perhaps, they may get it from some AI which may or may not overconfidently spew out some hallucinated garbage without giving a proper source. While it is still good that people are getting interested in astronomy despite the not-so-savory gateway, they may try seeking out additional resources to learn more.

Suppose you're looking up a newly-discovered interstellar comet that's been recently been claimed to be aliens (*ahem* 3I/ATLAS). Googling typically brings up recent news articles as the first results, and each may have differing amounts of detail, sometimes conflicting with others (shouting "No, it's not aliens" vs. "SCIENTIST SAYS ALIENS ARE HEADING TOWARD EARTH"). Same thing goes for social media. While some headlines can be easily recognized as junk, it takes a lot of effort and energy to cross-check and process all these different articles and voices! Oftentimes, these articles pander to a general audience, so you won't be able to find certain details like the object's orbit, discovery circumstances, comparison to other objects, etc. And when newer stories come out, old news get forgotten and become hard to find.

In another scenario, suppose you're looking up an obscure dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt. Most likely you'll get a bunch of really weird children-run Fandom articles with cartoon artwork at the top of the search results (yes, I'm calling out the Universe of the Universe and Solarballs Fanon wikis. Please get out of my results), with few databases and papers at the bottom. None of these are particularly helpful.

"But what about searching for scientific papers?", you may ask. Problem is, the average person doesn't know how to read them, nor do they know that they should try looking for them in the first place. Whenever you search up a somewhat obscure astronomical object through some common search engine, you may find at least one paper near the bottom of the search results. Chances are, the average person wouldn't scroll all the way down there, nor would they bother to read it. Even worse, papers can be paywalled (screw Elsevier and Springer Nature!!!!). So unless there's someone else to disseminate these papers in a more understandable language, the average person is restricted to looking at social media or news reports whenever they want to learn about an astronomical object.

Surely you want a singular, more centralized place that presents a record of whatever object you're searching for, with history, info, and everything documented about it without all the sensationalism and misinformation? If you're looking for "official" places for this purpose, there's databases like the NASA Exoplanet Archive (NEA), the JPL Small-Body Database (JPL SBDB), and many others. However, these don't appear at the top of search results and the layperson would not know that they're supposed to look for these in the first place. Sometimes, databases may be out of date and missing recent papers and conference abstracts—this is especially true for JPL SBDB and NASA's Eyes on Exoplanets. NASA has a "Solar System Exploration" website where it hosts a bunch of individual articles for many of the planets' moons, but they're often short and not very detailed (and for the more obscure moons like Despina, these articles are really outdated!).

So what's another easily accessible place where you can find a centralized compilation of information? Well, the answer to that is Wikipedia. It's very popular and it serves the purpose of documenting mostly everything about a topic in a readable manner for a general audience. Almost all the time, Wikipedia comes as the first result whenever you look up an astronomical object through a common search engine like Google. A lot of news articles and sometimes even official organizations like the European Southern Observatory link to Wikipedia (here and here) when informing the reader about a space concept. AI/LLMs and the Google Search info panel often get their information from Wikipedia as well. Considering that more people are starting to rely on Google searches and AI/LLMs (that's bad IMO, but I digress), Wikipedia is unexpectedly becoming a backbone to people's acquisition of information, whether they know it or not.

Since a lot of things are reliant on Wikipedia, I want it to at least be a decent hub of information and sources. It would be a place for people to learn about astronomical objects without all the sensationalism. Of course, that is very bold mission given that there's a countless number of things in space—it's impossible to manage that many articles! And yeah, I agree—I know it's futile, but it's gratifying to help out. And plus, you learn a lot of things when you do research for writing Wikipedia articles–which is why I enjoy writing them in the first place! It has really helped with developing my critical thinking and familiarity with astronomy papers.

WIKIPEDIA IS BIASED YOU STUPID LOSER

Lol, alright. Wikipedia does have genuine problems when it comes to topics related humans and politics, so I refuse to touch these with a hundred-gigaparsec pole. But for purely physical-science-related topics like astronomical objects and chemical elements? Yeah, it's usually alright. When you look at the articles on radioactive elements, a lot of these are somehow amazing and comprehensive! I find them super interesting and easily fall into reading them (massive kudos to WikiProject Elements for writing all of these!). But for technical science topics that involve tons of math and quantum mechanics? Oftentimes, not so great. That is to be expected, since those topics are incomprehensible to the average person (Wikipedia math articles are notorious for that). Anyone who knows enough to understand those kinds of topics often don't bother going to Wikipedia since they know it isn't the right place for that, so these overly technical articles are left as useless skeletons.

What about pure science topics that get marred by conspiracy theories, like the shape of the Earth? That can be a tough aspect to handle. Look at the article for 3I/ATLAS, which became a heated topic in 2025 because people were arguing that its aliens. There's certainly a bias against the alien viewpoint in this article, regarding it as "speculation" and bombarding it with opposing views. Is it warranted? I certainly think so, knowing that the calculations and evidence behind those claims were flawed. Someone else with less expertise would argue otherwise ("open your mind!" "he's a notable scientist" "that's censorship!"). The Comet Hale–Bopp article treats this sort of stuff in a similar manner, in which it shoves all the Heaven's Gate/UFO stuff in a dedicated section and doesn't talk about it outside of that section. But the Comet Hale–Bopp incident is a much older topic that's been mostly forgotten, so I don't think people would complain about that. Regardless, I do think that "silly" and "non-scientific" stuff in an astronomical object's history, like conspiracy theories and pop culture references, should be discussed (with both sides' viewpoints of course) so that people know what happened. It adds to the lore and mystique of the object, which shall feed to future generations to come (ooooh).

In the end, I definitely would not call Wikipedia "reliable", because it is *not* intended to be a source—it's supposed to be a written compilation of pre-existing sources. You find and cite the sources used in the Wikipedia article, not the Wikipedia article itself. That's what teachers have been trying to tell you, and it's for a good reason.

Good Articles

~ ~ ~ ~ [ Written by me ] ~ ~ ~ ~

2019 (10 8)

Kerberos (moon) ← needs update

Nix (moon) ← needs update

Hydra (moon) ← needs update

50000 Quaoar ← needs rewrite

Kepler-47

90482 Orcus ← needs rewrite

~~(486958) 2014 MU69 (later named Arrokoth)~~ ← needs rewrite

(225088) 2007 OR10 (later named Gonggong) ← needs rewrite

~~20000 Varuna~~ ← awful, needs rewrite

38628 Huya

2020 (4 3)

28978 Ixion ← needs rewrite

Hippocamp (moon)

~~2020 BX12~~ ← needs update

2017 YE5 ← needs update

~ ~ ~ ~ [ Reviewed by me ] ~ ~ ~ ~

Carl Grillmair (Jul 2026)
Rosa (sea otter) (Jul 2026)
...
...
...

Featured Articles I've contributed to

Makemake (rewritten in 2025, reviewed in 2025–2026. Mike Brown saw and approved this)
(thinking of nominating (84522) 2002 TC302 and 44 Nysa for FA, because it would be funny to bring loads of attention to an unremarkable, obscure-ass space rock)

☆ Articles I've created ☆

Pages are listed with their original names upon creation

2020 AV2 (Jan 2020)
2020 BX12 (Feb 2020)
2020 CD3 (Feb 2020)
P/2019 LD₂ (ATLAS) (May 2020)
2MASS J10475385+2124234
(May 2020)
2020 SO (Sep 2020)
WD 1856+534 (Sep 2020)
(523764) 2014 WC510 (Sep 2020)
2020 VT4 (Nov 2020)
List of asteroid close approaches to Earth in 2021 (Jan 2021)
~~2021 AV7 (Jan 2021)~~
~~2020 SL1 (Jan 2021)~~
2020 SW (Jan 2021)
2020 XL5 (Feb 2021)
2MASS J04070752+1546457
(March 2021)
2MASS J12195156+3128497
(March 2021)
2MASS J03480772−6022270
(March 2021)
2006 BZ8 (Aug 2021)
2006 RJ2 (Aug 2021)
2017 SV13 (Aug 2021)
2021 PH27 (Aug 2021)
2013 VZ70 (Aug 2021)
2016 AJ193 (Aug 2021)
(155140) 2005 UD (Sep 2021)
2021 DW1 (Oct 2021)
2019 XS (Oct 2021)
2011 JY31 (Nov 2021)
(35107) 1991 VH (Nov 2021)
~~2021 DR15 (Dec 2021)~~
~~2019 EU5 (Dec 2021)~~
Kepler-1708b (Jan 2022)
Proxima Centauri d (Feb 2022)
2022 EB5 (Mar 2022)
P/2011 P1 (McNaught) (Mar 2022)
2022 FD1 (Mar 2022)
~~2020 BE102 (May 2022)~~
~~2021 LL37 (May 2022)~~
4337 Arecibo (Jun 2022)
PSR J0952–0607 (Jul 2022)
2021 RR205 (Sep 2022)
2022 UR4 (Nov 2022)
P/2013 R3 (Catalina–PanSTARRS) (Dec 2022)
JADES-GS-z13-0 (Dec 2022)
2005 LW3 (Dec 2022)
P/2016 J1 (PanSTARRS) (Dec 2022)
S/2018 J 2 (Dec 2022)
S/2011 J 3 (Dec 2022)
~~S/2016 J 3~~ (Jan 2023)
S/2018 J 4 (Jan 2023)
~~S/2016 J 4~~ (Jan 2023)
(152830) 1999 VD57 (Jan 2023)
2023 CX1 (Feb 2023)
~~S/2022 J 1~~ (Feb 2023)
~~S/2022 J 2~~ (Feb 2023)
~~S/2022 J 3~~ (Feb 2023)
PSR J1930–1852 (Mar 2023)
PSR J1946+2052 (Mar 2023)
Swift J1818.0–1607 (Mar 2023)
WISE J0336−0143 (Mar 2023)
(98943) 2001 CC21 (Apr 2023)
17365 Thymbraeus (Nov 2023)
(458271) 2010 UM₂₆ and 2010 RN₂₂₁ (Nov 2023)
2024 BX1 (Jan 2024)
S/2021 N 1 (Feb 2024)
S/2002 N 5 (Feb 2024)
S/2023 U 1 (Feb 2024)
J1407b (Jul 2024)
Satellite of 38628 Huya (Jan 2025)
S/2025 U 1 (Aug 2025)
(95626) 2002 GZ32 (Sep 2025)
2025 TF (Oct 2025)
ZTF J1239+8347 (Mar 2026)
TOI-1853 b (Mar 2026)
2026 JH2 (May 2026)
Ko Arimatsu (Jun 2026)
Spider pulsar (Mar/Aug 2026; Shocksingularity helped)

— Articles I've overhauled, but did not create or promote to GA/FA —

Some of these are good enough to become Good Articles, but I've chosen not to nominate them because they are:

still too short, even when all existing sources are used (e.g. Xewioso, TOI-1338 c)
missing at least one or two major sections, because I lost motivation at the end (e.g. Hiʻiaka, 2002 TX300, C/2016 R2)
contains original research/corrections that I feel is still necessary to keep until a new study is published (e.g. 2002 XV93 albedo)
awaiting updates in the near-future, because they are the subject of ongoing studies (e.g. Chiminigagua Hubble observations, Weywot lightcurve, new Kallichore occultations)

Pages are listed with their original names upon creation, and ratings after overhaul

2018 VG18 (Jan 2020)
Siarnaq (Jul 2020)
2018 AG37 (Feb 2021)
47171 Lempo (Apr 2021)
C/2014 UN₂₇₁ (Bernardinelli–Bernstein) (Feb 2022)
V1400 Centauri (Jul 2024)
2024 YR4 (Feb 2025)
269 Justitia (Mar 2025)
(119951) 2002 KX14 (Mar 2025)
10 Hygiea (Mar 2025)
2017 OF201 (Jun 2025)
55565 Aya (Jun 2025)
10199 Chariklo (Jun 2025)
Trinculo (moon) (Jul 2025)
2023 KQ14 (Jul 2025)
(55636) 2002 TX300 (Jul 2025)
Namaka (moon) (Jul 2025)
3I/ATLAS (Jul 2025)
Hiʻiaka (moon) (Aug 2025)
532037 Chiminigagua (Aug 2025)
145452 Ritona (Aug 2025)
C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS) (Aug 2025)
Makemake (Sep–Oct 2025)
78799 Xewioso (Oct 2025)
OTS 44 (Dec 2025)
2025 MN45 (Jan 2026)
2025 GN1 (Jan 2026)
Kallichore (moon) (Jan 2026)
Kore (moon) (Jan 2026)
Neptunian desert (Mar 2026)
(612533) 2002 XV93 (May 2026)
TOI-1338 c (May 2026)
TOI-1338 (May 2026)
Neso (moon) (Jul 2026)
Sao (moon) (Jul 2026)
Laomedeia (Jul 2026)
Halimede (moon) (Jul 2026)
1998 KY26 (Jul 2026)
Psamathe (moon) (Jul 2026)
52246 Donaldjohanson (Jul 2026)
44 Nysa (Aug 2026)
Nysa–Polana complex (Aug 2026)

Trivial Wikipedia records

Over my many years on Wikipedia, I have written many articles, usually focusing on a certain type of astronomical object. They usually turn out pretty similar (for example, making articles about different asteroids), with a few distinguishing subcategories (for example, that asteroid is in the main asteroid belt, while the other is a centaur). For fun, I like to keep track specific categories of topics I've dealt with.

Record	Article	Date	Notes
First exoplanet GA'd by Nrco0e	TOI-1853 b	March 2026
First TESS discovery with GA	TOI-1853 b	March 2026
First circumbinary planet with GA	TOI-1338 b	May 2026
First unnamed minor planet with GA	(486958) 2014 MU69	October 2019–November 2019	Renamed 486958 Arrokoth on 13 November 2019; lost GA status in January 2026.
First 2MASS object with GA	2MASS J03480772−6022270	May 2021
First brown dwarf with GA	2MASS J03480772−6022270	May 2021
First centaur with GA	54598 Bienor	October 2025
First Uranian irregular moon with GA	Francisco (moon)	June 2026	Nominated by User:Yelps, but I did most of the writing
First Uranian moon GA'd by Nrco0e
First irregular moon GA'd by Nrco0e
First minor Neptunian moon GA	Hippocamp (moon)	October 2020
First article on a moon without a designation	Moon of 38628 Huya	January 2025	Split off from 38628 Huya article on 21 January 2025. The creation of this article prompted a crackdown on made-up provisional designations for minor-planet moons and led to an update of Wikipedia's astronomical object naming conventions.
First star system GA'd by Nrco0e	Kepler-47	September 2019
Most distant object GA'd by Nrco0e			Distance 3,420 ly (1,050 pc) from Earth.
Most massive object GA'd by Nrco0e			Total mass 1.299 M_☉.
Smallest object GA'd by Nrco0e	2020 BX₁₂	October 2020–May 2026	Diameter 205±65 m; lost GA status in May 2026.
First near-Earth asteroid with GA		October 2020–May 2026	Lost GA status in May 2026.
First unnumbered minor planet with GA		October 2020–June 2025	Numbered on 10 June 2025; lost GA status in May 2026.
Longest title of astronomical object article	(458271) 2010 UM₂₆ and (796785) 2010 RN₂₂₁	July 2025	Title length is 42 characters. Name was changed on 7 July 2025.
First list created by Nrco0e	List of asteroid close approaches to Earth in 2021	January 2021
Longest title of article/list created by Nrco0e	List of asteroid close approaches to Earth in 2021	January 2021	Title length is 51 characters.
First BLP by Nrco0e	Ko Arimatsu	June 2026

⚠ Conflicts of interest ⚠

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles:

As a researcher, I have been involved in the discovery and naming of some minor planets that have articles on Wikipedia. I am also responsible for precoveries of some minor planets like 2014 UZ224 and Valetudo (moon), although they do not affect the article commentary significantly to warrant declaration of conflict of interest. For personal reasons, I do not want to reveal my personal details here, although you can probably figure those out on your own.

☆ Wiki writing tips ☆

Don't manually type out citations, use https://citer.toolforge.org/ to do it for you. It saves SO MUCH time. I wish I knew about this sooner...
- (from experience, manually writing and fixing citations has been the most demotivating part of editing. I've abandoned lots of articles because I got bored fixing their citations manually.)
Write for the sake of explaining a genuinely interesting topic, not for a lengthy "good" article. Word count ≠ quality—there's a reason why Wikipedia follows summary style!
Focus on clarity and conciseness, not length. What I did to 2018 VG18 is the epitome of how to not write a good Wikipedia article—it's too inflated with trivial and wordy details. (Maybe I should WP:BLOWITUP...)
If you get stuck thinking about how to word a specific sentence, replace it with simple terms as a temporary placeholder, and then continue on with the rest of the paragraph. You can revisit that sentence later.
You may use an AI/LLM to help or get ideas for how to phrase sentences, but please don't straight up copy whatever it writes. AI is a tool, not a replacement. So it shouldn't just write for you. It can get things wrong, so you must always fact-check and change its results.
- Note that LLMs often write in a very wordy, flowery, and promotional prose that exaggerates significance of the topic. Don't do this. It's distracting and violates WP:PUFFERY.
Avoid unnecessary trivial details (i.e. listing out an asteroid's location, constellation, brightness, and speed at the time of discovery. Nobody needs to know that, nor would they care about it.)
Organize your code and wikimarkup formatting consistently. I highly recommend using spaces to separate parameters for templates and tables, especially if they're large.
Please please please put all your references in the {{reflist|refs= }} under the References section and define each reference with a refname. I seriously can't stand editing when there's a huge mess of citation and ref templates in the way like this: This is an example.<ref>{{cite web|title=Example|url=example.com|date=2009-09-09|accessdate=2015-07-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Example1|url=example.com|date=2005-04-20|accessdate=2019-01-01}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Example3|url=example.com|date=2009-09-09|accessdate=2015-07-14}}</ref>
Copy and save your wiki draft to a .txt file. I cannot emphasize this enough—please save your work as you can easily lose progress in the website editor because of a dead battery, power outage, or accidentally closing the tab.
Most importantly, just have fun and take breaks when you need to! If you're feeling stressed or feel like you have a nagging obligation to do things on Wikipedia (i.e. monitoring pages for vandalism, getting involved in debates and discussions, etc.), then it's best that you take a break, cool off, and touch some grass.

☆ Other Wiki notes ☆

If you're going to add artist's impressions of astronomical objects and phenomena, make sure it is scientifically accurate, comes from a reliable source, and follows guidelines on WP:ASTROART!
- NO AI UPSCALING ALLOWED!!! That simply takes away the real data and authenticity of the original image!

☆ Article Recent Changes to sustain my ""Wikipediholism"" ☆

☆ Useful wiki resources ☆

☆ External resources ☆

Basics of technical writing for astronomy graduate students
- Names of telescopes – Space-based telescopes are in italics (e.g. HST, Planck, Herschel), whereas ground-based telescopes are not (e.g. Keck, Gemini, VLA)
Practice typing $.mw-parser-output .tex-wordmark{font-family:"New Computer Modern","CMU Serif","cmr10","LMRoman10-Regular","Latin Modern Math","Symbola","Nimbus Roman No9 L","Times New Roman","Times",serif}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-upper{text-transform:uppercase}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-smallcaps{font-variant:small-caps}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-backwards{display:inline-block;transform:scaleX(-1)}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-a{font-size:0.75em;vertical-align:0.25em;margin-left:-0.36em;margin-right:-0.15em;line-height:1ex}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-bib{margin-right:-0.1ex}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-e{vertical-align:-0.25em;margin-left:-0.1667em;margin-right:-0.125em;line-height:1ex}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-e2{vertical-align:-0.5ex;margin-left:-0.1667em;margin-right:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-lyx-y{text-transform:uppercase;vertical-align:-0.25em;margin:0 -0.25ex}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-epsilon{font-style:italic;vertical-align:-0.35em;line-height:1em}.mw-parser-output .texhtml-upsilon{margin-left:-0.3em;vertical-align:0.5ex;line-height:0;margin-right:-0.3em} L a T e X$ $math{\text{ }}equations$ at texnique.xyz

~•~ ∇∆∇ Userbox Dump ∇∆∇ ~•~

✦ Practical background ✦

This user participates in
WikiProject Astronomy.

This user is a member of WikiProject Astronomical objects.

This user participates in the
Solar System task force.

This user is an undergraduate student majoring in Astrophysics.

This user is an advanced mathematician.

E=\gamma mc^{2}

This user understands Physics at an advanced level.

This user enjoys the subject of astronomy.

✦ _🟄 .^・･ﾟ^⋆_✦ . _＊꩜ ・_⋆ ^＊
This user is an astronomer.
_･🟄 ・･ﾟ ⋆ ^{✦ ⋆} ✦ _⋆ ‧͙ _・ ^🟄 _＊

This user is a Citizen Scientist.

This user participates in the Backyard Worlds project on Zooniverse!

This user participates in the Planet Hunters project on Zooniverse!

This user is an advocate of open research and open access.

This user has access to the
Wikipedia Library.

This user uses arXiv to research for Wikipedia.

This user uses the Astrophysics Data System to research for Wikipedia.

This user uses Sci-Hub to help do research for Wikipedia.

This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.

✦ Astronomy specializations and interests ✦

This user IS interested in Space.

This user is interested in astronomy.

This user is interested in
the Solar System

This user is interested in the moons of the Solar System.

This user is interested in the irregular moons of the planets.

This user is interested in the minor planets of the Solar System.

This user is interested in asteroids.

This user is interested in near-Earth asteroids.

This user is interested in binary asteroids.

This user is interested in comets.

This user is interested in active asteroids.

This user is interested in centaur asteroids.

This user is interested in
trans-Neptunian objects.

This user is interested in Kuiper belt objects.

This user is interested in the dwarf planets of the Solar System.

This user is interested in brown dwarfs.

This user is interested in neutron stars.

This user is interested in pulsars.

This user is interested in magnetars.

✦ Miscellanea ✦

This user's favorite planet is Saturn.

This user's favorite planet is Uranus.

This user's favorite planet is Neptune.

This user's favorite dwarf planet is Pluto.

This user's favorite dwarf planet is Haumea.

This user's favorite dwarf planet is Quaoar.

This user's favorite asteroid is Selam (moon).

This user's favorite asteroid is 90 Antiope.

This user's favorite comet is C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli–Bernstein).

This user would rather not have their atoms ripped apart by a magnetar.

This user's favorite chemical element is Caesium.

This user's favorite chemical element is Gold.

This user's favorite chemical element is Astatine.

\textstyle {\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}\,\;

This user only partially understands mathematics.

\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {n^{x}}{x!}}

This user understands capital sigma and pi notation, and you should too!

\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {n^{x}}{x!}}

This user loves watching the Mandelbrot set.

This user is an Internet addict
and is proud of it.

This user is a wikiarchaeologist and likes looking through page history for no particular reason.^±

General Jerryfoolery [ edit ]

Otter planks [ edit ]

This user enjoys drawing.

This user is an art lover.

This user is a furry.

This user's favourite animal is a
Red Fox.

Graphic design is my passion

This user enjoys computer and video game music outside gaming.

⊱═════≿══⊱✾⊰══≾═════⊰
This user believes that there is
no cost too great.

Welcome to WHITE SPACE.
This user have been living there for as long as they can remember.

♫

This user only uploads high quality video game rips.

⑨

This user tends to freeze frogs.

References [ edit ]

1. ^ Dude trust me

You just lost The Game.

⋆✦ Welcome! ✦