Talk:Performance engineering

Untitled

While it is current practice to refer to performance as a non-functional requirement, performance was considered a functional requirement in the OS/MFT and MVT era. Source: University of Windsor assembler-course instructor, circa 1980.

In particular, we were required to pre-declare resource requirements needed to achieve a performance level, which we were expected to state in job time for batch and response time for a specified load in TP.

If uptime is legitimately a functional requirement, then if only 1/2 the required performance is available, then the system is as damaged as if it were down 50% of the working day.

--davecb@spamcop.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davecb (talk • contribs) 15:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Just my two cents

This article needs to be written from the point of view of someone NOT in the industry. The article should be accessible to anyone who reads at the eighth grade level, and should explain terms without industry jargon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.11.5.125 (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Performance engineering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120211011904/http://channel9.msdn.com:80/wiki/default.aspx/PerformanceWiki.PerformanceEngineering to http://channel9.msdn.com/wiki/default.aspx/PerformanceWiki.PerformanceEngineering

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)